So, this is a neat little feature I've added: Sign of the Apocalypse.
Actually, all of these posts are signs that the day of reckoning is coming. 
Sometime this morning I was skimming across my usual daily blog roll and I tumbled upon a link that brought me to another link that eventually drifted my interested into Tyler Cowen and Naomi Klein. The two individuals eventually colluded and I ended up googling them, actually, I "binged" them. I came across a neat book review (which you should absolutely consider reading) our said economist wrote about Naomi Klein's book, "Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism".
Now I've read the majority of her book, and so I concur with the majority of Professor Cowen's dissection. Nonetheless, Naomi is the result of baffering leftist bias completely eroding factual evidence. She completely dismisses causal laws and has very little understanding of economics or intellectual history. Professor of Economics, Art Carden of Rhodes College is currently has a working paper that treats her entire book and the excessive inaccuracies that dampen it. Hence, I found Professor Cowen's remarks on Stiglitz remarks to be extremely well placed.
Technological Change and the Market for Books, 1450-1550
                      -
                    
Abstract: This paper considers how movable-type printing’s economic 
features shaped the early modern book market using product-level data. 
Building on a ...
1 hour ago
 
 

 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
You can argue with me here.